![]() Some of the issues Haelle calls out involve questionable practices like excessive data mining or cherry-picking subjects-activities that likely reflect increasing pressure on scientists to produce eye-catching results. Now the AHCJ Medical Studies Core Topic leader, she regularly takes down overblown or shoddy science. “I was like, ‘Holy crap, I’ve been doing it wrong,’” she says.įor years after the workshop, Haelle put those new skills into practice, poring over research studies for hours and delving deep into the thicket of their methods and results sections. Haelle came away from the session a new journalist. The two watchdog powerhouses-Schwitzer spearheads Health News Review and Oransky, Retraction Watch-taught Haelle and the other attendees how to catch flaws in research studies. ![]() But in the spring of 2012, Haelle attended a workshop run by health journalism veterans Gary Schwitzer and Ivan Oransky at the annual conference of the Association of Health Care Journalists (AHCJ) in Atlanta. She quoted press releases and read only study abstracts-practices that make most science journalists cringe. When freelance science journalist Tara Haelle first started writing about medical studies, she admits she had no clue what she was doing. ![]() Léelo en español Volkan Olmez/Unsplash (CC0) Degree Programs in Science, Health, or Environmental Writing Science Writing Resources (Elsewhere) That We Like.Guide to Using Alt-text to Make Images More Accessible.Sample Script & Survey for Tracking Source Diversity.Finding Diverse Sources for Science Stories.Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Resources.Tip Sheet for Newcomers to Science Writing.Where to Get Started at The Open Notebook.The Covering Science Slack: A Peer-Mentoring Community.Sharon Dunwoody Science Journalism Mentoring Program.Virtual Workshop Series: The Craft of Science Editing.Navigating the Science Journalism World. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |